Of all the training in an International Youth Organization that I am involved in, Parliamentary Procedure or Meeting Procedure is the one that I am well trained in, and proud to be trained in this area.
Yesterday after the Chess Competition of the Chinese Clan Association, that I was the Organizing Chairman, we had a post mortem meeting over the dinner. In attendance, there are assistant executive secretaries, executive secretaries, and the organizing committee team.
When I started to chair the meeting and say let us see what is going wrong with this event for the past 2 days. Then one of my assistant executive secretaries start to take over my chair. Ended up, he chaired my meeting for me for the whole night, and at the end of the meeting, he asked me: "Mr. Leong, do you still have anything to add on?"
Now, what is wrong with this? This has been going on from day one I joined the association until today. Respect given to the assistant that took over my chair was because he has been working in association for the past 24 years, and he knows a lot of things and history of events. Over the past few years, we respect him and ask for his opinion on certain things and before we make any decision for organization. However, incident like last night is not tolerable.
As an assistant executive secretary, he supposed to keep his mouth shut and let all the other organizing committee do the talking as if it comes to vote, assistant executive secretary has no voting right. This is about knowing your right in the meeting.
The meeting will be very efficient and effective if everyone in the meeting know they own roles, and get their preparation done before the meeting.
Friday, June 12, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



Question...now is, how do one tackle such incident? Or more direct is, how did the organising chairman handled the issue...
ReplyDeleteChairman can always throw the person whom does not abide the meeting procedures, constitution and bylaws, and rules.
ReplyDeleteOf course, that is the chairman's choice. I did not choose to do that because of respect to the elderly.
would recon some parliamentary procedure books or material for everyone to read some how and some way. Everything goes down to education and knowing the Can and the Can't.
ReplyDelete